requested by anon

(Source: fyeahlostgirl)

saqua23:

thewomanfromitaly:

listengirlfriends:

When it comes to objectification, this is a great example of why comparing male strip clubs to Hooters is a “false equivalent.”

i’m creating a kickstarter for cojones right now

I am a male and I would happily go to Cajones

saqua23:

thewomanfromitaly:

listengirlfriends:

When it comes to objectification, this is a great example of why comparing male strip clubs to Hooters is a “false equivalent.”

i’m creating a kickstarter for cojones right now

I am a male and I would happily go to Cajones

107,463 plays

captainstormwind:

the truth is out there.

Karen Gillan as Nebula

(Source: how-ood)

daddyjared:

sam and dean + hugs

thecatsmeow90:

know-your-body:

shesanobject:

She can only carry one man’s child at a time, but you can knock up as many bitches as you want. That’s why they’re all worthless and replaceable to us, but every cock means the whole world to them. People have known it since the dawn of time. Bitches have known it too.

HAHAHA. Yes, you’re right, women can only carry one man’s child at a time. Men can fertilize many at a time. But you DO realize that that’s actually why nature treats MEN as the more DISPOSABLE sex, right?
It’s (part of the reason) why women live longer. Men have a harder time surviving throughout all stages of life. Even in the womb, boys are more likely to have problems and/or be miscarried. 150 boys are conceived per every 100 girls, but by the time of birth, it’s roughly 1 to 1. 
https://www.cmu.edu/CSR/case_studies/women_live_longer.htmlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-72255/Why-women-live-longer-men.htmlhttp://www.drweil.com/drw/u/QAA401207/Why-Do-Women-Live-Longer-than-Men.htmlhttp://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/ep026685.pdf
"Women may have a biological advantage because the female role in reproduction is vital to survival - not only do women give birth, but they nurse their babies and care for them during their early years. Men’s role in reproduction is limited and, for that reason, longevity in men may not be as vital to the continuation of the species.”"Being male is now the single largest demographic risk factor for early mortality in developed countries."
Although men are physically stronger, women seem to have better immunity etc. and survive for longer periods of time, even in the womb.
The woman has to survive 9 months of pregnancy, plus (evolutionarily) a few months of breastfeeding. A man can just drop dead right after intercourse, but the baby would be born just fine.
If you had 1 man and 10 women, you can have 10 kids a time. If you have 10 women and 1 man, good luck. You need more women surviving than you need men. That basically means that you can keep a society going with 1,000 men and 100,000 women. In other words: a mainly female society.
If we’re going to strip away everything except for the sole required functions of species survival - food, water, procreation - it’d actually make more sense to say that men are solely sperm donors than that women are solely birth givers. Evolutionarily speaking, women are the ones directly in the process of giving birth, nurturing, etc. That’s not to say that men are just there for sperm, but THAT would make more sense than saying women were just there to give birth. As for everything else that happens throughout life, such as hobbies and jobs, women are just as capable as men. 
I never understood why people said things like “women were made as helpers to men” but then said “women’s role is to care for the kids & men’s role is to protect women and children.” like, um? who’s the helper in that situation if, according to you, the male is a secondary person protecting other people?
So yeah. You’re trying to use pregnancy as a way to say that women are inferior to men, but you’re sadly mistaken.
*Gendered language because this is a sexist issue (saying that women are inferior to men bc pregnancy, which has actually been a common claim in patriarchal societies)

Lmao anti-feminists kill me

thecatsmeow90:

know-your-body:

shesanobject:

She can only carry one man’s child at a time, but you can knock up as many bitches as you want. That’s why they’re all worthless and replaceable to us, but every cock means the whole world to them. People have known it since the dawn of time. Bitches have known it too.

HAHAHA. Yes, you’re right, women can only carry one man’s child at a time. Men can fertilize many at a time. But you DO realize that that’s actually why nature treats MEN as the more DISPOSABLE sex, right?

It’s (part of the reason) why women live longer. Men have a harder time surviving throughout all stages of life. Even in the womb, boys are more likely to have problems and/or be miscarried. 150 boys are conceived per every 100 girls, but by the time of birth, it’s roughly 1 to 1. 

https://www.cmu.edu/CSR/case_studies/women_live_longer.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-72255/Why-women-live-longer-men.html
http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/QAA401207/Why-Do-Women-Live-Longer-than-Men.html
http://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/ep026685.pdf

"Women may have a biological advantage because the female role in reproduction is vital to survival - not only do women give birth, but they nurse their babies and care for them during their early years. Men’s role in reproduction is limited and, for that reason, longevity in men may not be as vital to the continuation of the species.
"Being male is now the single largest demographic risk factor for early mortality in developed countries."

Although men are physically stronger, women seem to have better immunity etc. and survive for longer periods of time, even in the womb.

The woman has to survive 9 months of pregnancy, plus (evolutionarily) a few months of breastfeeding. A man can just drop dead right after intercourse, but the baby would be born just fine.

If you had 1 man and 10 women, you can have 10 kids a time. If you have 10 women and 1 man, good luck. You need more women surviving than you need men. That basically means that you can keep a society going with 1,000 men and 100,000 women. In other words: a mainly female society.

If we’re going to strip away everything except for the sole required functions of species survival - food, water, procreation - it’d actually make more sense to say that men are solely sperm donors than that women are solely birth givers. Evolutionarily speaking, women are the ones directly in the process of giving birth, nurturing, etc. That’s not to say that men are just there for sperm, but THAT would make more sense than saying women were just there to give birth. As for everything else that happens throughout life, such as hobbies and jobs, women are just as capable as men. 

I never understood why people said things like “women were made as helpers to men” but then said “women’s role is to care for the kids & men’s role is to protect women and children.” like, um? who’s the helper in that situation if, according to you, the male is a secondary person protecting other people?

So yeah. You’re trying to use pregnancy as a way to say that women are inferior to men, but you’re sadly mistaken.

*Gendered language because this is a sexist issue (saying that women are inferior to men bc pregnancy, which has actually been a common claim in patriarchal societies)

Lmao anti-feminists kill me

(Source: playfulpregnants)

you teach your daughters
how to rub poison on their skin

remember

to teach your sons
how not to be serpents.

─ Ijeoma Umebinyuo (via theijeoma) ─

(Source: fuckitykidneys)

thecwspn:

Misha Collins and his little angels want to give you one last reminder! 
Register here: https://www.gishwhes.com/

thecwspn:

Misha Collins and his little angels want to give you one last reminder! 

Register here: https://www.gishwhes.com/